UNSC Meeting on India-Pakistan Tensions Over Pahalgam Terror Attack

The United Nations Security Council recently held a closed-door meeting to address the escalating tensions between India and Pakistan following the Pahalgam terror attack...

Why This Matters

Involvement of the UNSC in regional conflicts highlights international concerns and the potential for broader geopolitical implications, engaging global audiences.

Public Sentiment Summary

Public opinion reflects frustration and skepticism about the United Nations Security Council's (UNSC) effectiveness in resolving India-Pakistan tensions, especially following the Pahalgam terror attack. There is widespread criticism of the UNSC's perceived bias and inefficacy, with calls for India to take decisive actions independently. Nationalistic support for India, notably Prime Minister Modi, is evident, alongside demands for stronger international condemnation of Pakistan's alleged role in terrorism.

Highlighted Comments

The world doesn't need U.N anymore.

Let UNSC discuss this issue with Tea and Biscuits. It is powerless.

India should stop lobbying and act according to their national interests.

The UNSC is a joke of an organization. These resolutions don't matter one bit.

UN should strongly condemn this time rather than showing concern sympathy...

Parties Involved

  • United Nations Security Council
  • India
  • Pakistan

What the people want

United Nations Security Council: The public is losing faith in your ability to address global conflicts effectively. Decisive and unbiased actions are needed to regain trust and demonstrate your relevance in resolving international issues.

India: There is robust national sentiment urging India to prioritize its national interests and take strong, independent actions against terrorism, with or without international support.

Pakistan: Global perception demands transparency and accountability regarding alleged terrorism support. Constructive engagement and resolution efforts are crucial to alleviate tensions.